How to make a standalone document with one equation? The Next CEO of Stack Overflow“You can't use `eqno' in restricted horizontal mode. endequation”Bad math environment delimiter in standalone classStandalone package errors when creating tableProblems with the standalone class when using certain environments and certain math symbolsamsmath: error using subequation environment “Missing endgroup inserted endalign”begindocument ended by endlandscapeCompilation fails with eqnarray after reinstalling Miktexafter update my code stopped compiling! Missing $ inserted. erroralgorithmicx crashes standaloneProblem with usepackagestandalone in standalone file in new TeX Live distributionHow to use subcaption with standalonePath problem with included file inside of a standalone filePgfplots working as standalone but not in main documentstandalone - Can I specify the font size in the document?Standalone chapters with separate references and countersHow to automatically compile my standalone files before inserting them?Standalone tikz figure in landscape modeStandalone refuses to output some pictures included in a larger documentPicture created with standalone looks quite different than the original one

Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

Why do remote US companies require working in the US?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Rotate a column

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed

Does it make sense to invest money on space investigation?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

How to get from Geneva Airport to Metabief?

A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

How do I align (1) and (2)?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Axiom Schema vs Axiom

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?



How to make a standalone document with one equation?



The Next CEO of Stack Overflow“You can't use `eqno' in restricted horizontal mode. endequation”Bad math environment delimiter in standalone classStandalone package errors when creating tableProblems with the standalone class when using certain environments and certain math symbolsamsmath: error using subequation environment “Missing endgroup inserted endalign”begindocument ended by endlandscapeCompilation fails with eqnarray after reinstalling Miktexafter update my code stopped compiling! Missing $ inserted. erroralgorithmicx crashes standaloneProblem with usepackagestandalone in standalone file in new TeX Live distributionHow to use subcaption with standalonePath problem with included file inside of a standalone filePgfplots working as standalone but not in main documentstandalone - Can I specify the font size in the document?Standalone chapters with separate references and countersHow to automatically compile my standalone files before inserting them?Standalone tikz figure in landscape modeStandalone refuses to output some pictures included in a larger documentPicture created with standalone looks quite different than the original one










64















I was surprised to find that standalone package can not compile a document with an equation:



documentclassstandalone
begindocument
beginequation % not working!
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation
enddocument


Is there an option or some workaround that allows this? The current error is something like:



! Missing $ inserted.


in line 4. (The idea of course is that the including (main) document can just input the standalone without knowing if is going to be an equation or something else)










share|improve this question
























  • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55















64















I was surprised to find that standalone package can not compile a document with an equation:



documentclassstandalone
begindocument
beginequation % not working!
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation
enddocument


Is there an option or some workaround that allows this? The current error is something like:



! Missing $ inserted.


in line 4. (The idea of course is that the including (main) document can just input the standalone without knowing if is going to be an equation or something else)










share|improve this question
























  • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55













64












64








64


27






I was surprised to find that standalone package can not compile a document with an equation:



documentclassstandalone
begindocument
beginequation % not working!
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation
enddocument


Is there an option or some workaround that allows this? The current error is something like:



! Missing $ inserted.


in line 4. (The idea of course is that the including (main) document can just input the standalone without knowing if is going to be an equation or something else)










share|improve this question
















I was surprised to find that standalone package can not compile a document with an equation:



documentclassstandalone
begindocument
beginequation % not working!
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation
enddocument


Is there an option or some workaround that allows this? The current error is something like:



! Missing $ inserted.


in line 4. (The idea of course is that the including (main) document can just input the standalone without knowing if is going to be an equation or something else)







equations standalone






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 31 '12 at 6:20









Joseph Wright

205k23563891




205k23563891










asked Mar 31 '12 at 5:06









alfCalfC

7,833655117




7,833655117












  • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55

















  • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55
















Its work in texlive2011 check it.

– Mu30 murugans2katgmail
Mar 31 '12 at 6:55





Its work in texlive2011 check it.

– Mu30 murugans2katgmail
Mar 31 '12 at 6:55










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















86





+100









The 1.0 version of standalone changed the default option from preview to crop. The latter has several benefits for the use-case the author (me) deemed most common, but forces restricted horizontal mode, which doesn't allow for lists or paragraphs. This causes an error for certain environments which require these.



One easy way is to enable the preview mode manually by using it as a class option (documentclass[preview]standalone). You can also reenable this option as default using the standalone.cfg file as described in the manual.
However, with preview you get a full line-wide PDF with the equation number (1) at the right, which is not really what you want, is it?



documentclass[preview]standalone
begindocument
beginequation % works now!
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation
enddocument


Instead it is better to use inline math mode using $ .. $ or ( .. ), which will work with crop and doesn't produce a full line nor a number. You can add displaystyle if you need it:



documentclassstandalone
begindocument
$displaystyle
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
$
enddocument


There is also the varwidth option which will wrap the content in a varwidth environment (varwidth package), which is a variable width minipage. This also allows for paragraph breaks etc. and might be better for multi-line equations. varwidth takes an option length argument as text width.






share|improve this answer























  • I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:33











  • With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

    – alfC
    Apr 1 '12 at 21:54












  • @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

    – Kit
    Nov 15 '13 at 15:43












  • @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

    – jmc
    Jun 12 '14 at 11:22


















7














standalone uses preview internally.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackage[active,tightpage]preview

% if you need the equation number, remove the asterix
PreviewEnvironmentequation*

% if you need paddings, adjust the following
PreviewBorder=0pt


begindocument
beginequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
endequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
enddocument





share|improve this answer

























  • thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

    – alfC
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:33











  • @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

    – kiss my armpit
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:41












  • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55











  • @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:27











  • @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:29


















2














I tried your code with a slight adjustment. Instead of beginequation and endequation I wrapped the equation with dollar symbols like this:



 documentclassstandalone 
begindocument
$F(V_x, T, sigma) = E(V_x) + D(T,sigma)$
enddocument


This compiles without error for me. It does not provide you with equation numbering though.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50162%2fhow-to-make-a-standalone-document-with-one-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    86





    +100









    The 1.0 version of standalone changed the default option from preview to crop. The latter has several benefits for the use-case the author (me) deemed most common, but forces restricted horizontal mode, which doesn't allow for lists or paragraphs. This causes an error for certain environments which require these.



    One easy way is to enable the preview mode manually by using it as a class option (documentclass[preview]standalone). You can also reenable this option as default using the standalone.cfg file as described in the manual.
    However, with preview you get a full line-wide PDF with the equation number (1) at the right, which is not really what you want, is it?



    documentclass[preview]standalone
    begindocument
    beginequation % works now!
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation
    enddocument


    Instead it is better to use inline math mode using $ .. $ or ( .. ), which will work with crop and doesn't produce a full line nor a number. You can add displaystyle if you need it:



    documentclassstandalone
    begindocument
    $displaystyle
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    $
    enddocument


    There is also the varwidth option which will wrap the content in a varwidth environment (varwidth package), which is a variable width minipage. This also allows for paragraph breaks etc. and might be better for multi-line equations. varwidth takes an option length argument as text width.






    share|improve this answer























    • I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:33











    • With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

      – alfC
      Apr 1 '12 at 21:54












    • @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

      – Kit
      Nov 15 '13 at 15:43












    • @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

      – jmc
      Jun 12 '14 at 11:22















    86





    +100









    The 1.0 version of standalone changed the default option from preview to crop. The latter has several benefits for the use-case the author (me) deemed most common, but forces restricted horizontal mode, which doesn't allow for lists or paragraphs. This causes an error for certain environments which require these.



    One easy way is to enable the preview mode manually by using it as a class option (documentclass[preview]standalone). You can also reenable this option as default using the standalone.cfg file as described in the manual.
    However, with preview you get a full line-wide PDF with the equation number (1) at the right, which is not really what you want, is it?



    documentclass[preview]standalone
    begindocument
    beginequation % works now!
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation
    enddocument


    Instead it is better to use inline math mode using $ .. $ or ( .. ), which will work with crop and doesn't produce a full line nor a number. You can add displaystyle if you need it:



    documentclassstandalone
    begindocument
    $displaystyle
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    $
    enddocument


    There is also the varwidth option which will wrap the content in a varwidth environment (varwidth package), which is a variable width minipage. This also allows for paragraph breaks etc. and might be better for multi-line equations. varwidth takes an option length argument as text width.






    share|improve this answer























    • I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:33











    • With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

      – alfC
      Apr 1 '12 at 21:54












    • @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

      – Kit
      Nov 15 '13 at 15:43












    • @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

      – jmc
      Jun 12 '14 at 11:22













    86





    +100







    86





    +100



    86




    +100





    The 1.0 version of standalone changed the default option from preview to crop. The latter has several benefits for the use-case the author (me) deemed most common, but forces restricted horizontal mode, which doesn't allow for lists or paragraphs. This causes an error for certain environments which require these.



    One easy way is to enable the preview mode manually by using it as a class option (documentclass[preview]standalone). You can also reenable this option as default using the standalone.cfg file as described in the manual.
    However, with preview you get a full line-wide PDF with the equation number (1) at the right, which is not really what you want, is it?



    documentclass[preview]standalone
    begindocument
    beginequation % works now!
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation
    enddocument


    Instead it is better to use inline math mode using $ .. $ or ( .. ), which will work with crop and doesn't produce a full line nor a number. You can add displaystyle if you need it:



    documentclassstandalone
    begindocument
    $displaystyle
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    $
    enddocument


    There is also the varwidth option which will wrap the content in a varwidth environment (varwidth package), which is a variable width minipage. This also allows for paragraph breaks etc. and might be better for multi-line equations. varwidth takes an option length argument as text width.






    share|improve this answer













    The 1.0 version of standalone changed the default option from preview to crop. The latter has several benefits for the use-case the author (me) deemed most common, but forces restricted horizontal mode, which doesn't allow for lists or paragraphs. This causes an error for certain environments which require these.



    One easy way is to enable the preview mode manually by using it as a class option (documentclass[preview]standalone). You can also reenable this option as default using the standalone.cfg file as described in the manual.
    However, with preview you get a full line-wide PDF with the equation number (1) at the right, which is not really what you want, is it?



    documentclass[preview]standalone
    begindocument
    beginequation % works now!
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation
    enddocument


    Instead it is better to use inline math mode using $ .. $ or ( .. ), which will work with crop and doesn't produce a full line nor a number. You can add displaystyle if you need it:



    documentclassstandalone
    begindocument
    $displaystyle
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    $
    enddocument


    There is also the varwidth option which will wrap the content in a varwidth environment (varwidth package), which is a variable width minipage. This also allows for paragraph breaks etc. and might be better for multi-line equations. varwidth takes an option length argument as text width.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 31 '12 at 9:25









    Martin ScharrerMartin Scharrer

    204k47652825




    204k47652825












    • I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:33











    • With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

      – alfC
      Apr 1 '12 at 21:54












    • @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

      – Kit
      Nov 15 '13 at 15:43












    • @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

      – jmc
      Jun 12 '14 at 11:22

















    • I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:33











    • With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

      – alfC
      Apr 1 '12 at 21:54












    • @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

      – Kit
      Nov 15 '13 at 15:43












    • @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

      – jmc
      Jun 12 '14 at 11:22
















    I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:33





    I actually have a math option in mind for standalone, but currently no time to implement it.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:33













    With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

    – alfC
    Apr 1 '12 at 21:54






    With the [preview] option now works! 1) yes, the horizontal mode must have been a dilemma. 2) Answering your question about the numbering can give you ideas on how to implement a math option in standalone: In the final/long document is likely that one wants the numbering (so one is forced to use the equation environment) but in the preview/standalone the numeration doesn't make any sense. So one can add the following to the preamble of the standalone makeatletter def@eqnnum makeatother Something like this can be handled by your planned math option.

    – alfC
    Apr 1 '12 at 21:54














    @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

    – Kit
    Nov 15 '13 at 15:43






    @MartinScharrer, I would like to see an align equation environment in your planned math option. Perhaps I'm being self-entitled, but hear out my use case: I'm using sympy to output some LaTeX math code and latexmk to refresh a PDF viewer. I'm still starting out with using this kind of environment. My objective is to automate tedious symbolic mathematical manipulations, especially helpful for non-math majors who need to tangle with big math (engineers like me). Or perhaps a full-blown math environment compatibility for standalone?

    – Kit
    Nov 15 '13 at 15:43














    @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

    – jmc
    Jun 12 '14 at 11:22





    @MartinScharrer — Thanks for this great package! Is there any chance that you can add a note about this to the documentation? Currently, search for “math” does not give any results…

    – jmc
    Jun 12 '14 at 11:22











    7














    standalone uses preview internally.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[active,tightpage]preview

    % if you need the equation number, remove the asterix
    PreviewEnvironmentequation*

    % if you need paddings, adjust the following
    PreviewBorder=0pt


    begindocument
    beginequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer

























    • thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

      – alfC
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:33











    • @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

      – kiss my armpit
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:41












    • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

      – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
      Mar 31 '12 at 6:55











    • @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:27











    • @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:29















    7














    standalone uses preview internally.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[active,tightpage]preview

    % if you need the equation number, remove the asterix
    PreviewEnvironmentequation*

    % if you need paddings, adjust the following
    PreviewBorder=0pt


    begindocument
    beginequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer

























    • thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

      – alfC
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:33











    • @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

      – kiss my armpit
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:41












    • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

      – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
      Mar 31 '12 at 6:55











    • @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:27











    • @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:29













    7












    7








    7







    standalone uses preview internally.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[active,tightpage]preview

    % if you need the equation number, remove the asterix
    PreviewEnvironmentequation*

    % if you need paddings, adjust the following
    PreviewBorder=0pt


    begindocument
    beginequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer















    standalone uses preview internally.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackage[active,tightpage]preview

    % if you need the equation number, remove the asterix
    PreviewEnvironmentequation*

    % if you need paddings, adjust the following
    PreviewBorder=0pt


    begindocument
    beginequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    F(V, T) = E(V) + D(T)
    endequation* % remove the asterix if you need the equation number
    enddocument






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 31 '12 at 5:41

























    answered Mar 31 '12 at 5:19









    kiss my armpitkiss my armpit

    13.3k20174407




    13.3k20174407












    • thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

      – alfC
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:33











    • @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

      – kiss my armpit
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:41












    • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

      – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
      Mar 31 '12 at 6:55











    • @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:27











    • @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:29

















    • thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

      – alfC
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:33











    • @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

      – kiss my armpit
      Mar 31 '12 at 5:41












    • Its work in texlive2011 check it.

      – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
      Mar 31 '12 at 6:55











    • @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:27











    • @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

      – Martin Scharrer
      Mar 31 '12 at 9:29
















    thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

    – alfC
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:33





    thanks, but I don't understand what I have to do. Even if I compile your equivalent code (based on preview) the equation is not really rendered as math but as text.

    – alfC
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:33













    @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

    – kiss my armpit
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:41






    @alfC: You need to load amsmath. See my edit above.

    – kiss my armpit
    Mar 31 '12 at 5:41














    Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55





    Its work in texlive2011 check it.

    – Mu30 murugans2katgmail
    Mar 31 '12 at 6:55













    @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:27





    @S.Murugan: It works with the preview option enabled. This is the case by default with v0.x, but no longer with v1.x as explain in my answer. A "original" TL2011 might still have v0.x, but an updated one has v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:27













    @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:29





    @DamienWalters: standalone only uses preview if the preview option is used, which is no longer the default in v1.0.

    – Martin Scharrer
    Mar 31 '12 at 9:29











    2














    I tried your code with a slight adjustment. Instead of beginequation and endequation I wrapped the equation with dollar symbols like this:



     documentclassstandalone 
    begindocument
    $F(V_x, T, sigma) = E(V_x) + D(T,sigma)$
    enddocument


    This compiles without error for me. It does not provide you with equation numbering though.






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      I tried your code with a slight adjustment. Instead of beginequation and endequation I wrapped the equation with dollar symbols like this:



       documentclassstandalone 
      begindocument
      $F(V_x, T, sigma) = E(V_x) + D(T,sigma)$
      enddocument


      This compiles without error for me. It does not provide you with equation numbering though.






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        I tried your code with a slight adjustment. Instead of beginequation and endequation I wrapped the equation with dollar symbols like this:



         documentclassstandalone 
        begindocument
        $F(V_x, T, sigma) = E(V_x) + D(T,sigma)$
        enddocument


        This compiles without error for me. It does not provide you with equation numbering though.






        share|improve this answer













        I tried your code with a slight adjustment. Instead of beginequation and endequation I wrapped the equation with dollar symbols like this:



         documentclassstandalone 
        begindocument
        $F(V_x, T, sigma) = E(V_x) + D(T,sigma)$
        enddocument


        This compiles without error for me. It does not provide you with equation numbering though.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 31 '12 at 6:04









        Saaru LindestøkkeSaaru Lindestøkke

        9441129




        9441129



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50162%2fhow-to-make-a-standalone-document-with-one-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Contact us Navigation menu Navigation menuLeave a Reply Cancel reply Post navigationRecent PostsRecent CommentsArchivesCategoriesMeta

            Farafra Inhaltsverzeichnis Geschichte | Badr-Museum Farafra | Nationalpark Weiße Wüste (as-Sahra al-baida) | Literatur | Weblinks | Navigationsmenü27° 3′ N, 27° 58′ OCommons: Farafra

            Tórshavn Kliima | Partnerstääden | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuun62° 1′ N, 6° 46′ W62° 1′ 0″ N, 6° 46′ 0″ WWMOTórshavn