Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province
Is it possible to use a NPN BJT as switch, from single power source?
The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?
Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See
What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
Writing differences on a blackboard
I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
Dominated convergence theorem - what sequence?
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?
Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?
Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?
How to check if all elements of 1 list are in the *same quantity* and in any order, in the list2?
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
$endgroup$
Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.
(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)
series
series
asked 14 hours ago
InTheMoodForNowInTheMoodForNow
203
203
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
$endgroup$
Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?
This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.
There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.
- mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.
- battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.
- some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.
- "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure
- AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions
- The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.
Yes/No/Maybe
That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.
What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?
Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse
Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass
Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?
What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?
What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?
What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?
answered 9 hours ago
Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75
69.9k225101
69.9k225101
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for this!
$endgroup$
– InTheMoodForNow
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
$endgroup$
It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.
Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:
[Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.
Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.
Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.
In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.
answered 14 hours ago
TransistorTransistor
87.9k785189
87.9k785189
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
$endgroup$
– HandyHowie
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
$endgroup$
– Transistor
12 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
$endgroup$
Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
Sim SonSim Son
12310
12310
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown